Justification of the Structure of Flexible Adaptive Educational Program of Higher Education (on the Example of Master's Education)
https://doi.org/10.54884/1815-7041-2025-82-1-8-20
Abstract
Solving the urgent problem of searching for a new architecture of higher education and the corresponding methodological basis is possible by designing the structure of a flexible adaptive educational program that gives the opportunity to quickly reorient content, forms, technologies training and means of assessing the effectiveness of its implementation in preparing competitive graduates of a pedagogical university who meet the requirements of the modern labor market. This article presents the grounds for changing approaches to the design of modern educational programs and the resources necessary for the implementation of a flexible adaptive educational program; the understanding of the modular construction of the curriculum at the university and the content of the module, which is focused on the expected result – the leading competence, are revealed. The integrity of assessing the result of professional development of a graduate of a pedagogical master's program is substantiated.
Keywords
educational program,
program structure,
flexible adaptive program,
personalization,
modular structure of the curriculum
Supporting agencies: This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation as part of the state assignment ‘Transformation of university-level teacher education via flexible adaptive educational programs’ (project No. VRFY-2024-0003)
About the Authors
I. Batrakova
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Inessa S. Batrakova, Doctor of pedagogical sciences, Professor
Department of Theory and Methodology of Continuous Pedagogical Education
St. Petersburg
I. Gladkaya
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina V. Gladkaya, Candidate of pedagogical sciences, Associate professor
Department of Theory and Methodology of Continuous Pedagogical Education
St. Petersburg
E. Glubokova
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena N. Glubokova, Candidate of pedagogical sciences, Associate professor
Department of Theory and Methodology of Continuous Pedagogical Education
St. Petersburg
S. Pisareva
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana A. Pisareva, Doctor of pedagogical sciences, Professor
Department of Theory and Methodology of Continuous Pedagogical Education
St. Petersburg
References
1. Zeer, E. F., Symanyuk, E. E. (2017). Methodological guidelines for the development of transprofessionalism of teachers of vocational education. Education and Science, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 9–28. (In Russ.)
2. Avvo, B. V., Gutnik, I. Yu., Matrosova, Yu. S. et al. (2017) Educational process in the master's degree program in «Pedagogical education»: design experience. St. Petersburg: Svoe Publishing House. (In Russ.)
3. Tryapitsyna, A. P. (2013). Contents of Professional Training of Students – Future Teachers to Solve the Problems of Modernization of General Education. Universum: Bulletin of Herzen University, no. 1, pp. 50–61. (In Russ.)
4. Efimova, E. M., Efimov, D. O. (2021). Methodological foundations for designing flexible educational programs in a network format. In: Bulletin of the Maikop State Technological University, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 87–96. (In Russ.)
5. Klementovichus, Ya. Ya., Trifonova, N. V., Pokrovskaya, N. N. et al. (2016). Genesis, Trends, and Problems of Development of Network Educational Programs. St. Petersburg: SPb State University of Economics. (In Russ.)
6. Zamyatina, O. M., Mozgaleva, P. I., Lyba, A. A. (2017). Personification as a condition for the formation of teachers' readiness to implement the Federal State Educational Standard of General Education. Man and Education, no. 3 (52), pp. 15–21. (In Russ.)
7. Kargina, Z. A. (2015). Individualization, personalization, personification - the leading trends in the development of education in the 21<sup>st</sup> century : a review of modern scientific research. In: Shirikov O. N. (ed.) Science and education: modern trends : collective monograph. Cheboksary: CNS "Interactive plus", рp. 172–188. (In Russ.)
8. Gromyko, Yu. V. (2007). Personalization in education: initiating education, raising consciousness and personal growth. Anthropological matrices of the twentieth century. L. S. Vygotsky – P. A. Florensky: failed dialogue. – Invitation to dialogue. Moscow, pp. 52–98. (In Russ.)
9. Batrakova, I. S., Glubokova, E. N. (2020). Personalized trajectory of professional development of master's students as a pedagogical concept. Letters to Emission.Offline, no. 3, p. 2838. (In Russ.)
10. Konstantinova, L. V., Petrov, A. M., Shtykhno, D. A. (2023). Rethinking approaches to the tiered system of higher education in Russia in the context of leaving the Bologna process. Higher Education in Russia, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 9–24. (In Russ.)
11. Akhayan, A. A., Batrakova, I. S., Borovik, L. K. et al. (2022). Design of Invariant Modules of Master's Degree Educational Programs in the Field of «Education and Pedagogical Sciences». Vol. 1. St. Petersburg: Center for Scientific and Production Technologies "Asterion". (In Russ.)
12. Aranova, S. V., Batrakova I. S., Borovik, L. K., et al. (2025). Preparing master's students for the state final certification. Textbook for university teachers (part 2). St. Petersburg: Asterion. (In Russ.)
13. Batrakova, I. S., Gladkaya, I. V., Koroleva, N. N., Tryapitsyn, A. V. (2024). Characteristics of the integrity of the assessment of the results of professional development of master's students. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities and Science, no. 213, pp. 25–33. (In Russ.)
14. Burlakova, I. A., Klopotova, E. E. (2023). Effectiveness of Master's Degree Training through the Eyes of Master's Students. Bulletin of Practical Psychology of Education, vol. 20, no. 2, рp. 7–25. (In Russ.)
15. Polevaya, N. M., Romanova, L. L. (2017). Assessment of the quality of training in the master's program: analysis of criteria. Baltic Humanitarian Journal, vol. 6, no. 2 (19), pp. 173–175. (In Russ.)
16. Batrakova. I. S., Bogdanovskaya. I. M., Gladkaya. I. V. et al. (2024). Features of the implementation of a system of means for internal assessment of the quality of graduate training at a pedagogical university (methodological recommendations) Available at: http://met.emissia.org/offline/2024/met117.htm (Accessеd: 20 December 2024). (In Russ.)
17. Fedorov, A. A., Budarina, A. O., Polupan, K. L. et al. (2021). Scientific and methodological substantiation of unified approaches to the development of the federal state educational standard of higher pedagogical education of the next generation. Analysis of existing approaches to the development of the Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Pedagogical Education. Kaliningrad: I. Kant Baltic Federal University. (In Russ.)
18. Konstantinova, L. V., Petrov, D. A., Shtykhno, A. M. (2023). Rethinking approaches to the level system of higher education in Russia in the context of the exit from the Bologna process: Higher Education in Russia, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 9–24. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Batrakova I., Gladkaya I., Glubokova E., Pisareva S. Justification of the Structure of Flexible Adaptive Educational Program of Higher Education (on the Example of Master's Education). Man and Education. 2025;(1):8-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.54884/1815-7041-2025-82-1-8-20
Views:
110
Email this article 