Social manipulation: the essence and perception of the problem by participants of the educational process
https://doi.org/10.54884/1815-7041-2026-86-1-119-132
Abstract
The article explores the characteristics of social manipulation based on modern approaches to this phenomenon and analyzes its various aspects in the school environment. The first part of the article examines the essence of the concept of "social manipulation." It is concluded that this phenomenon has been sufficiently studied within the framework of sociological, social-psychological, political science, socio-philosophical, and linguistic approaches, but that its disclosure from a pedagogical perspective is weak. Examples of definitions within various approaches are provided. The characteristic features of social manipulation are highlighted. The second part of the work is devoted to interpreting the results of a survey conducted among homeroom teachers and students in grades 7–11 in Tyumen and the Tyumen region. In addition to a general analysis of the opinions of homeroom teachers and students, the article examines the convergence and divergence of opinions between homeroom teachers and adolescents on the same issues. The study provides an understanding of the positions of homeroom teachers and students on the issue under study and reveals the need for more information on ways to counter social manipulation and for organizing more practical classes.
About the Author
U. A. ShirokolavRussian Federation
Ulyana A. Shirokolav – Postgraduate student of the Department of methodology and modern pedagogical technologies; Foreign language teacher
Tyumen
References
1. Dotsenko, E. L, (1997). Psychology of manipulation: phenomena, mechanisms, and protection. Moscow: CheRo, Moscow State University Press. (In Russ.)
2. Yelishev, S. J., (2019). Social manipulation of youth: a scientific monograph. Moscow: Canon+ ROOI "Rehabilitation". (In Russ.)
3. Krupenko, M. A., (2024). Social manipulation of youth in the internet space: a comparison of Russia and the USA. Theory and Practice of Social Development, no.2, pp. 66–71. (In Russ.)
4. Levashov, V. and Staroverov, V. (2009) Manipulation of public opinion: sociological aspects of analysis. Sociology of Power, no.4, pp. 28–42. (In Russ.)
5. Osipova, N.G. (2018). Mechanisms of social manipulation using communication technologies Molchanova, G. and Robustova, V. (eds.) Language. Culture. Translation. Communication. Moscow: KDU, University Book, pp. 36–40. (In Russ.)
6. Pugachev, V. P. (2025). Freedom management. Moscow: LENAND. (In Russ.)
7. Sidorenko, E. V. (2007). Training in influence and resistance to influence. SPb.: Rech. (In Russ.)
8. Sur, E. I. (2012). Manipulation: concept, main features, and structure. Actual Problems of the Humanities and Natural Sciences, no.3, pp. 143–146. (In Russ.)
9. Surtaeva, N. N. (2020). The professional activity of a teacher in countering social manipulation of young people. World of Science, Culture, and Education, no.3 (82), pp. 227–229. (In Russ.)
10. Tsymbal, E. A. (2010). The phenomenon of social manipulation (socio-philosophical analysis). Actual Problems of the Humanities and Natural Sciences, no.11, pp. 161–165. (In Russ.)
11. Shipova, A. V. (2007). Manipulation of consciousness and its specificity in modern society. Abstract of Ph.D. thesis, North Caucasus State Technical University. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Shirokolav U.A. Social manipulation: the essence and perception of the problem by participants of the educational process. Man and Education. 2026;(1):119-132. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.54884/1815-7041-2026-86-1-119-132
JATS XML
