Conceptual basis for the meta-disciplinary content of general secondary education
https://doi.org/10.54884/1815-7041-2025-84-3-6-18
Abstract
New requirements for the quality of secondary general education have made the problem of improving its content relevant. To solve it, it was necessary to rethink the existing ideas about the essence of the content of education, its structure, the grounds for selection and design, as well as to formulate and test new theoretical ideas that allow developing the content of education adequate to the challenges of the time. The article describes the concept of selection and structuring of the meta-subject content of secondary general education, presents the essential characteristics and structure of this content. The methodological basis of the study is the anthropological approach, in line with the ideas of which the essential characteristics of the content of meta-subject education are defined. The model of meta-subject content of education was tested at seventeen innovative sites of the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Belarus.
About the Author
E. V. Gelyasina
Vitebsk State University named after P.M. Masherov
Belarus
Belarus
Elena V. Gelyasina – Cand. Sci. (Education), Associate Prof. of the Department of pedagogy and educational management
Vitebsk
References
1. Lednev, V.S. (1980). Content of general secondary education: Problem of the structure. Moscow: Pedagogy. (In Russ.)
2. Guseltseva, M.S. (2025). Superdiversity as a challenge to old paradigms. In: Educational Policy, 20(1), 104–115. (In Russ.)
3. Simon, H.A. (1973). The Structure of Ill Structured Problems. In: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181-201. (In Russ.)
4. Diev, V.S. (2010). Uncertainty as being an attribute and factor for decision-making. In: Bulletin of Novosibirsk state university, ser.: Philosophy.. 8, i(1), 3–8. (In Russ.)
5. Semenova, A.N. (2024). Anthropological aspect of education. In: Theory and practice of education in the focus of research on the history of pedagogy: achievements, problems, prospects. Moscow: Corporate university for educational development. (In Russ.)
6. Firsova, А.E. (2023). The application of the anthropological approach in modern native pedagogical theory and innovative educational practice. Volgograd : Sphere. (In Russ.)
7. Mamardashvili, М.К. (2012). Vilnius lectures in the social philosophy : experiences of the physical metaphysics. SPb. : Azbuka. (In Russ.)
8. Mamardashvili, М.К. (2018). Conversations about thinking. St. Petersburg : Azbuka.
9. Gelen, A. (1988) About the systematics of anthropology. The problem of person in western philosophy. Мoscow : Progress. (In Russ.)
10. Kotyrova, M.P. (1989). The semantic structure of the russian scientific text and its extralinguistic basis (functional-stylistic aspect) [dissertation]. Sverdlovsk (In Russ.)
11. Skatkin, М.N.& Krajewski, V.V. (1981). Content of general secondary education. Problems and perspectives. Moscow: Znanije. (In Russ.)
12. Atutov, P.R. (2001). Pedagogy of the development of students for work: content and process base. Moscow: Кumir. (In Russ.)
13. Stoyanov, V.S. (1992). Polytechnic training for high school students as the basis of their professional mobility. Abstract of Ph. D. thesis, АPS NRI work training end professional orientation. (In Russ.)
14. Perminovа, L.M. (2021). Fifth element of educational content, about crucial function of the academic discipline and integration in education. In: Values and meanings, 1 (71), 131–140. (In Russ.)
15. Osmolovskaja, I.M. (2006). Cultural approach of content formation for education. In: Education and science, 2, 120–127. (In Russ.)
16. Khutorskoy, А.V. (2001). Modern didactics : guide for the student. St. Petersburg: Piter. (In Russ.)
17. Khutorskoy, А. V. (2012). Meta-subject content of education from the perspective of relevance to human. In: Bulletin of the Institute for Human Education, 1. Available at: https://eidos-institute.ru/jour-nal/2012/100/Eidos-Vestnik2012-115-Khutorskoy.pdf (Accessed: 10.03.2025). (In Russ.)
18. Zorina, L.Y. (1989). Program – textbook – teacher. Moscow: Znanie. (In Russ.)
19. Lerner, I.Y. (1988). Academic discipline, topic, lesson. Moscow: Znanie. (In Russ.)
20. Zverev, I.D. end Каshin М.P. (1985). Improving educational content at school. М. : Pedagogica. (In Russ.)
21. Serikov, V.V. (2018). Pedagogical reality and pedagogical knowledge. Methodological reflection experience. Moscow: Editorial and publishing house of the Russian New university. (In Russ.)
22. Тоrhova, А.V. (2014). Anthropological aspects of teacher education. In: Bulletin of the Belarusian state pedagogical university, Ser. 1: Pedagogy, psychology, philology, 1, 24–28. (In Russ.)
23. Antsiferova, L.I. (2006). Personality development and problems of gerontology. Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS. (In Russ.)
24. Volkova, N.E. (2024). Conceptual abilities as a factor of intellectual productivity and resilience. Ph.D. thesis, Institute of Psychology of the Russian academy of sciences (In Russ.)
25. Rubinstein, S.L. (2003). Being and consciousness. Man and the world. St. Petersburg: Piter. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Gelyasina E.V. Conceptual basis for the meta-disciplinary content of general secondary education. Man and Education. 2025;(3):6-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.54884/1815-7041-2025-84-3-6-18
Views:
163
Email this article 