Kuber-construction as a tool for developing younger students’ skills of the XXI century
https://doi.org/10.54884/1815-7041-2025-84-3-197-209
Abstract
The article considers the program «KUBERZNAYKA: travel from the future to the past with Russian cubes» as an innovative means of developing skills of the 21st century among younger students. The pedagogical value of constructive activities within the framework of KUBER travels, contributing to the formation of creativity, critical thinking, communication, self-organization and engineering literacy, is justified. The program integrates elements of the STEAM approach and project activities, which allows you to build training on the principles of personality-oriented and activity-oriented approaches. Both the theoretical foundations of the program and the results of the pilot implementation in educational practice are analyzed. The pedagogical conditions for the effective formation of meta-subject competencies in primary schoolchildren are being clarified. Particular attention is paid to the potential of plot-role formats that contribute to the development of initiative, visual thinking and reflection. The conclusion is made about the high degree of compliance of the program with the current requirements of Russian education and the directions of its scaling and improvement are indicated. The article is addressed to educators, methodologists and developers of educational programs interested in the practice of developing functional literacy and soft skills in elementary school.
About the Author
L. V. BersenevaRussian Federation
Larisa V. Berseneva – Dr. Sci. (Psychology), Prof., Department of Psychology
Sevastopol
References
1. OECD (2018). The future of education and skills 2030: OECD learning compass. Paris: OECD.
2. Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Karapetyan, L.V. & Glotova, G.A. (2018) Structural model of emotional and personal well-being. In: National Psychological Journal, no. 2, pp. 46–56. Doi: 10.11621/npj.2018.0206. (in Russ.)
4. Fullan, M. (2018). Deep learning: engage the world, change the world. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
5. Pellegrino, J.W. & Hilton, M.L. (2012) Education for life and work: developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington: National Academies Press.
6. Bezrukikh, M.M. (2011). School and family risk factors and their influence on children’s physical and mental health. In: Bulletin of Practical Psychology of Education, 8(1), pp. 16–21. (in Russ.)
7. Kotkina, E.A. (2024). Substantive foundations of the formation of universal regulatory learning actions of younger schoolchildren in project activities. In: Humanities and Education, 15(3[59]), pp. 48–51. Doi: 10.51609/2079-3499_2024_15_03_48. EDN: RAEILH. (in Russ.)
8. Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine: rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.
9. Resnick, M. (2017). Lifelong kindergarten: cultivating creativity through projects, passion, peers, and play. Cambridge: MIT Press.
10. Zelenkova, I.V. & Kuznetsova, M.A. (2023). Formation of regulatory universal learning actions in technology lessons in primary school. In: New results of primary general education as a problem of pedagogical science and practice: Proceedings of the 14th All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation, Perm, 4 April 2023. Perm: Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical University, pp. 107–111. (in Russ.)
11. Bersenyeva, L.V. (2025). KUBERZNAIKA: travel from the future to the past with Russian cubes. A program in construction within the subject “Labor” (technology) for primary school students (grades 1–4). Sevastopol: KUBER. (in Russ.)
12. Logachyova, E.A. (2023). Health-preserving model of the educational environment: theoretical project development. In: Mission of Confessions, no. 72. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zdoroviesberegayuschaya-model-obrazovatelnoy-sredy-teoreticheskaya-razrabotka-proekta (Accessed: 15 July 2025). (in Russ.)
13. Popova, O.A., Sorochikhina, T.M. & Romanova, T.T. (2017). Workshop for teachers on the topic “Project or student research work?”. In: Experiment and Innovations in Education, no. 2, pp. 48–51. (in Russ.)
14. Duma, E.A., Kibaeva, K.V., Mustafina, D.A., Rakhmankulova, G.A. & Rebro, I.V. (2013). Levels of formation of engineering thinking. In: Advances in Current Natural Sciences, no. 10, pp. 143–144. (in Russ.)
15. Framework for 21st Century Learning. Washington, D.C.: Partnership for 21st Century Skills. URL: https://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21/frameworks-resources (Accessed: 10 June 2025).
16. Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. (2014). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
17. Yakman, G. (2017). STEM vs. STEAM education. In: International Technology and Engineering Educators Association, 77(5), pp. 12–17.
18. Karapetyan, L.V. & Glotova, G.A. (2021). Internal well-being as a complex dynamic system. In: Perspectives of Science and Education, 3(51), pp. 404–416. Doi: 10.32744/pse.2021.3.28. (in Russ.)
19. Kuznetsova, S.A. & Miroshnichenko, V.V. (2024) Study of the development of social competence of younger schoolchildren through supplementary education. In: Pedagogy of Modernity, 3-1(30), pp. 76–78. EDN: BTFEOB. (in Russ.)
20. Choskhanova, S.N. (2016) Interactive teaching methods in primary school: problems and prospects. Moscow: Vlados. (in Russ.)
21. Doyle, C. (2019). Developing children’s engineering habits of mind through STEM activities. In: International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(3), pp. 409–428.
22. Polya, G. (2020). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Review
For citations:
Berseneva L.V. Kuber-construction as a tool for developing younger students’ skills of the XXI century. Man and Education. 2025;(3):197-209. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.54884/1815-7041-2025-84-3-197-209
