Strategic guidelines for building the level model of continuous professional improvement of pedagogical staff
https://doi.org/10.54884/1815-7041-2025-84-3-171-179
Abstract
The article argues for the idea of creating a holistic system of continuing education of educational workers, successively including levels of organization of this system, such as federal, regional and municipal levels. The design of this model is based on an analysis of innovative experiences of organization of postgraduate education in different regions of the country. The article proposes to consider possibilities of implementation of strategic guidelines for building a model of development of professional skills of pedagogical and managerial staff. These guidelines are taken into account the current trends of expansion of functional institutions for continuing training, analysis of the essential structure of professional competence of employees in the education system and experience of personal continuing training. In accordance with this, the article analyzes current trends and methodological principles of organization of activities of management services to implement a new version of the level model of qualification improvement. The implementation of the proposed system, in the opinion of the authors, will contribute to the creation and implementation of a single federal system for scientific and methodological support of pedagogical workers.
Keywords
continuing education, professional expertise,
pedagogical staff,
specialists of the educational management system,
qualification improvement,
model,
strategic guidelines
Supporting agencies: The work was carried out as part of the state task 073-03-2025-069/5 on «Personnel policy and professional development of teachers: analysis of practices, programs, deficits».
About the Authors
A. E. Maron
Federal State University of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Arkady E. Maron – Dr. Sci. (Education), Prof., Leading Researcher
Moscow
A. Yu. Sergienko
Federal State University of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksandra Yu. Sergienko – Cand. Sci. (Education) Senior Researcher
Moscow
References
1. Sinenko, V. Ya. (2012). Modernization of the system of additional professional pedagogical education. In: Siberian Pedagogical Journal, no.3, pp.73-80. (in Russ.)
2. Ilyasova, O.A., Saygushina, S.V. & Polikarpova, N.V. (2021) Systemic approach to assessment of quality of education in the institution of further vocational education. In: Scientific and Methodological Support for Quality Assessment of Education, no. 1(12), pp. 49-55. (in Russ.)
3. Tarasenko, L.V. & Vaskov, M.A. (2020) Establishment of the institute of additional vocational education and its role in social management: Russian and foreign experience. Moscow, RUSIENCE. (In Russ.)
4. Zharkova, E.N. & Kalashnikova, N.G. (2013) Model of personalized continuing education: a typical regional solution. In: Education Management: Theory and Practice, no. 3(11), pp. 135-144. (in Russ.)
5. Gargay, V.B. (2005). Teacher development in the West: a behavioral approach. In: Pedagogika, no. 6, pp. 94–103. (in Russ.)
6. Savinova, L.F. (2013). Modern models of advanced training: experiences, problems, perspectives. In: Scientific Support of Advanced Training System, no.3-4(16-17), pp. 5–13. (in Russ.)
7. Bezuevskaya, V.A. (2017). Problems of organizing a regional system for the training of pedagogical staff. In: Discussion, no. 3(77), pp. 73–79. (in Russ.)
8. Balagina, E.V., Uvarova, L.I. & Fedoseeva, I.V. (2016). The model of personalized continuing education of educational workers in the Arkhangelsk region and a system for evaluating the quality of learning outcomes. In: Additional Professional Teacher Education, no. 3, vol. 2, pp. 24–30. (in Russ.)
9. Maron, A.E. & Rezinkina, L.V. (2015) Stages of personal and professional development of the teacher: from adaptation in the profession to meta-activity. In: Man and Education, no. 3(44), pp. 74–78. (in Russ.)
10. Ogarev, E.I. (1995). Continuing education: basic concepts and terms (thesaurus). IAE RAO, SPb. (In Russ.)
11. Klucharev, G.A. & Ogarev, E.I. (2002). Continuing education in conditions of transformation. Moscow, Frantera. (in Russ.)
12. Solodkova, E.A. (2021). Accompaniment of continuous improvement of professional competence of teachers of the region of Chelyabinsk on directions of evaluation of quality of education. In: Scientific and Methodological Support for Quality Assessment of Education, no. 1(12), pp. 88–93.(in Russ.)
13. Bukhtiarova, E. Yu. (2020). Methodological basis of continuous professional development of teachers. In: Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education, no. 68-3, pp. 51–54. (in Russ.)
14. Gargay, V.B. (2004). Teacher development models in the West. In: Methodist, no.2, p. 8.(in Russ.)
15. Gargay, V.B. (2004). Levels of professional competence of the teacher and ways of learning in the improvement of the qualification of education workers in the West (on USA material). In: Methodist, no. 6, pp. 11–13. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Maron A.E., Sergienko A.Yu. Strategic guidelines for building the level model of continuous professional improvement of pedagogical staff. Man and Education. 2025;(3):171-179. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.54884/1815-7041-2025-84-3-171-179
Views:
46
Email this article 